Rhônalpénergie-Environnement
HOST
| Name of the Hosting Project Partner: |
| Contact person(s) for Study Visit (Name, e-mail): |
SHORT DESCRIPTION OF THE TOOL/MEASURE
| Name of the Measure :
Comprehensive renovations with EPC+ by the regional public operator OSER |
| Type : (Autonomous or Part of an integrated action plan?) |
Topic addressed:
|
| Managing Organisation (if not project partner, please provide name of the organization and website):
La Région Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Contacts: Rhônalpénergie Environnement |
| Geographic Coverage (Country/Region): La Région Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes |
| Starting Date and Expected Ending of the tool or measure: |
| Beneficiaries / Target Group: La Région Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
Regional Energy and Environment Agency of Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes (8 000 000 inhabitants, 4 300 municipalities…) |
| Rationale (starting point, challenge, objectives, initiator(s) and stakeholders involved):
Focus areas: – Energy Efficiency – Renewable Energies – Protection of Environment – Sustainable Development Key objectives: Promote, inform and support local policies and projects led by public and local authorities. |
| Financing (costs? regional/national/European public or private resources?): |
| Implementation Modality / Methodology:
1. Founding of a Public operator for public building energy refurbishment: -Founded in 2012 with 11 shareholders: Regional Council + 9 Municipalities + 1 energy service operator -5 new municipalities in 2015 + 5 new in 2016 -Half of the municipalities have less than 20 000 inhabitants, the smalest is under 5 000 inhabitants Objectives: • Comprehensive renovation of public buildings: ⇒ < 96 kWh/m² (BBC Low consumption label) ⇒ energy consumption and CO2 reduction: factor 2 to factor 4 * Energy savings guarantee: EPC * Third party financing • Local construction chain enterprises mobilization
|
| Internal organization of the implementation of the measure / Administrative Work-Flow:
They have an In-house model: • Shareholders are only public authorities • Membership fee : 1 €/inhabitant • SPL staff : 2 projects managers, a lawyer and a specialist of financial aspects. • Services only for the members (as their own services):
|
Performance Indicators (if applicable):
|
| Outputs:
Work done : 8 projects o 3 schools : Bourg en Bresse o 5 secondary schools: Regional Council Work in progress : 9 projects o City hall: Cran Gévrier o Mediia library: Montmélian o 2 secondary schools: Givors and Saint Priest en Jarez o School: Grigny o Big School and sport hall: Annecy o School and sport hall: Bourg en Bresse Many feasibility studies
|
| Impact:
– Common public operator: Experience and efficiency increase with each project and is accessible for each municipality (organization, tools…) – In house = Real collaboration with the internal municipal services (added skills and complementarity) – It’s not possible to work only on energy renovation because the needs are much wider (regulation, modernization…) – Involvement of local firms: * tenders are always the same and the projects quite small, * SME’s gathering is promoted (information meetings, Chamber of commerce and Cluster assistance…) |
| Strong features of the tool/measure:
Weak features and criticalities of the tool/measure: It seems that the initiative is not economically sustainable. |
| From the starting, did you apply any change in design and implementation? Any corrective action?
|
| What are the lessons learned for your region? For other regions? What would be conditions for potential transfer?
|
| What are the next steps/follow up actions? (if applicable):
|
| Additional comments:
|
|
Name of the Measure: “Tronicpower” system for public lighting energy efficiency and energy saving |
| Type: (autonomous or part of an integrated action plan?) |
| Topic addressed:
· Integrated energy |
| Managing Organisation (if not project partner, please provide name of the organization and website):
Municipality of Altidona |
| Geographic Coverage (Country/Region):
Local – Municipality of Altidona (Marche, Italy) |
| Starting Date and Expected Ending of the tool or measure:
|
| Beneficiaries / Target Group:
– Local Authority (Municipality of Altidona) |
| Rationale (starting point, challenge, objectives, initiator/s and stakeholders involved):
The project implemented a preliminary analysis of daily energy consumption, by reading the counters, and the consequent removal of the existing power supplies. On the selected public lighting a “tronicpower” electronic power supply was then installed, together with a high energy efficiency metal halide lamp. |
| Financing: |
| Implementation Modality / Methodology: |
| Internal organization of the implementation of the measure / Administrative Work-Flow: |
| Performance Indicators (if applicable): |
| Outputs:
Energy saving: approx. 250,000 kW / h annually |
| Impact:
In addition to energy savings, an important benefit of the project was given by the financial saving that allowed compensating the investment. |
| Strong features of the tool/measure:
Ability to identify funding for the implementation of the intervention.
Weak features and criticalities of the tool/measure: Lack of economic and human resources for project evaluation and management. |
| From the starting, did you apply any change in design and implementation? Any corrective action?
– |
| What are the lessons learned for your region? For other regions? What would be conditions for potential transfer? |
| What are the next steps/follow up actions? (if applicable): |
| Additional comments:
More information is available by contact: Ufficio Tecnico Comune di Altidona – ing. Stefano Postacchini, tel. +39 0734 936353, e-mail: tecnico@altidona.net |